Well, those of us who supported David Davis and who hoped ardently for his victory will be feeling a bit hung-over after the Conservative Party’s leadership contest result.
We believe our man had the gravitas, the punch, the experience and the maturity of his years to be New Labour’s Grim Reaper whilst also believing that Mr Cameron lacked all these qualities - and that he may continue to lack them for the foreseeable future.
Criticism of Mr Cameron wasn’t necessarily personal. If the Conservative Party was looking for an image make-over - that ‘change’ we have been endlessly told we need - then David Cameron was a good choice. He’s young, he’s got a nice family, he won’t frighten the horses and has banged on so much about how we’ve got to change and be compassionate that, maybe, he’s convinced the electorate that that’s what we’ve actually done. Further, Mr Cameron isn’t a dope, isn’t an incompetent and he isn’t a fool.
Trouble is, in some areas we’re not sure what he actually is. More dangerously, for those of us who believe, for example, that a firm line must be taken on drug use and an uncompromising line be taken with our Lords and masters in the EU, Mr Cameron seems, so far, decidedly unsatisfactory.
So how should conservatives view Mr Cameron’s ascension to the Party’s leadership?
First of all - and most of all - we’ve got to accept the result of the leadership election and support the Party’s leader. Regardless of preference before the election, we’re now after the election and Mr Cameron isn’t the enemy, he’s an ally against the enemy. Labour is the enemy and it is that Party on whom we should train our guns. We must direct our fire ferociously against a government that represents nothing that is decent or good in England but which is, in fact, conducting a huge social trick on us, one designed to keep them in power and us in their power. We should consider anybody who opposes Labour to be a friend.
Second, there is room for optimism. I’m not talking about his maiden performance in the Commons the other day which, I understand (I haven’t actually seen it), was well-delivered and scored points on the government. The optimism I’m especially referring to is with regards to the cabinet appointments - Hague, David Davis and Liam Fox, particularly. The latter two will help keep the Party - and, hopefully, a future Conservative government - in line in case Mr Cameron has a Blair flush now and again. And they’ll give the Party necessary experience and gravity without appearing old and grouchy.
Another reason for optimism is that Mr Cameron takes over when the government’s tax-and-spend habits and all the rest of its lunatic mentality are coming home to roost. Further, Blair’s in trouble because Mr Cameron may well support parts of his education Bill while parts of his own party will vote against it. A Labour leader pushing through legislation only because the Opposition supports it is asking for trouble from his own party - and he’ll get it.
But, of course, just because things aren’t looking good for the government doesn’t mean they will look much better for the Conservative Party if the Conservative Party doesn’t (a) properly capitalise on the government’s numerous failings and (b) offer a concrete, precise and compelling vision for this country’s future.
Mr Cameron must now prove to those of us who currently feel he is too whimsical and vague in his pronouncements that he has solid ideas and a clear-cut philosophy on all areas of government. It is, after all, from these ideas that we would expect meaningful and effective policies to spring. The difficulty for members of the Conservative Party for too long has been that we just don’t know where we stand on anything that matters. At the moment we still don’t and, even if it’s too early for detailed policies, we must at least have a clear policy direction. The canvas is pretty blank and we must start filling it.
The friendly, internal fight is over. The real fight now begins. Our enemy is leftist Labour and our principles are the tried and tested, rooted-in-reality traditions and values of England and the English. Whatever else we might feel there seems to be a mood - and mood matters - of optimism, renewal and possibility in both the Party and in much of the press. If that’s what it takes to have our ideas listened to with anything approaching an open mind then it’s all for the good. Let’s use the opportunity to remove this government and install something a little more sane. Before it’s too late.

Gary:
I think you and I both agree that it comes down to ideology, policy and pragmatism. Cameron’s Shadow Cabinet looks to be a good choice in that he has MPs who have some very good Conservative ideas yet at the same time drawing a line under Thatcherism, however I think it would be a mistake to run a significant Kitchen Cabinet in parallel with his formal Cabinet. What is required now is for Cameron to find his feet and develop policy relevant for the 21st Century, conserving the good within our society and changing the bad.
Comment by Thersites — December 9, 2005 @ 12:18 pm
You may be in danger of missing the message while staring at the style.
“We must direct our fire ferociously against a government that represents nothing that is decent or good in England.. ”
Its exactly that approach which Cameron is openly challenging. If the Conservatives actually stop attempting to hack the government, Labour will probably rip itself apart. By supporting the Prime Minister, Blair will become isolated from the rump unionist Left of his own party.
Comment by DE — December 9, 2005 @ 12:59 pm
I have to admit as a “Blogger for Davis”, I have so far been pleasantly surprised by Cameron, and I really can’t believe I’m saying it; still early days and all, but his hijacking of environmentalism is spot on…
Comment by James (Whatsthatsmell) — December 9, 2005 @ 7:37 pm
“rooted-in-reality traditions and values of England and the English”
Hi Gary. Don’t forget that we need to make gains in Scotland and Wales to win the next election.
Comment by Tory Convert — December 9, 2005 @ 7:41 pm
Well now - guess I’m going to be the spectre at the feast!
First, I wish that the optimism of all my Conservative friends is proven correct and that Nulabour is swept from power.
However, I don’t buy into the Cameron agenda one jot. His current environ-mentalist dabbling with the likes of anti-American Gummer and Goldsmith sickens me. I think he will move to the LEFT of Blair, and despite all the nonsense spoken in the media, Blair is a leftist.
So I guess I will judge DC by his words and actions - but I fear I will be in a small camp of those who seek a principled right of centre party in power that will take on the Welfare State, stand resolutely against terrorism, take the axe to the EU, put the Great back into Great Britain & NI.
Comment by David Vance — December 9, 2005 @ 11:54 pm
Unfortunately, some of the good in our society is no longer there to be conserved. It needs to be rediscovered. Backing the government as a tactic is no good. Backing it when it does the right thing is fine but our overall message has to be that Labour is intrinsically bad and we’re intrinsically different otherwise why will people vote for us?
Whether DC has hijacked environmentalism as a tactic or embraced it sincerely is unknown I think. Either way, it does hurt the left’s ridiculous - but skillfully cultivated - image as the only one who ‘cares’.
I think we may have to start questioning whether English values and Scottish values are the same. England is joined to a territory which, if it wasn’t for the financial benefits of the union, would happily disengage from us. England at heart is conservative; Scotland - and Wales - I wonder about.
Thing is, we only have hope and optimism to go on at the moment. We’re now in a waiting pattern but certainly Party members have got to put their backs into the task ahead. Remove Labour and then work on the nature and shape of the Conservative administration. The more conservative we are (that is NOT a shift to the right, by the way), the more in keeping with the natural instincts of the people we’ll be.
Comment by Gary Monro — December 10, 2005 @ 12:11 pm
Don’t you mean “values of the British” ?
Comment by Poosh — December 10, 2005 @ 8:58 pm
I would make a point that if disgusting PR was the case in Scotland, the Conservatives would garner a great deal of seats - so I’m not too sure that Scottish values are that different from England.
Comment by Poosh — December 10, 2005 @ 9:02 pm
Poosh - alas, in the 2003 Scottish Parliament elections, even with proportional representation (allbeit in a rather dirty form), the Scottish Tory’s only managed 18 seats out of 129. They received 14% of the vote. Compare that to more than a quarter of Scots voting for the left-leaning nationalist parties (there are two, one of which is verging on communism and received nearly 5% of the vote). Then there are the Lab/Libs which make up the rest. In total, Scotland has 5/6 of their ‘politicians’ on the left, even with PR!
I don’t think the Conservatives will be getting many votes in Scotland in the next election, even with Boy Wonder leading the way.
Comment by lascivious — December 11, 2005 @ 9:06 am
If only the the enemy was ‘leftist Labour’.
I wish they were left-wing personally, we both dislike the current government but for different reasons.
I resent the fact that they are now about as Socialist as the Conservative party circa 1982.
Hmmmm, should I vote for the red puppet or the blue puppet?
Comment by driverchris — December 11, 2005 @ 1:19 pm
Well, I appear to be standing corrected!
Comment by Poosh — December 11, 2005 @ 10:20 pm