I can honestly say Mr Brooks that I do not. If you want to explain how it directly influences the voting intentions of MPs though I’d be interested to hear….

This game is designed to distribute rewards to those who will give the most to our corporate government which never faces elections.

The tweedle dumb and twaddle dumber circus gives the allusion that the public govern themselves.

If a candidate studied the “credit creation” mechanism and decided this issue should be examined openly he would not receive the favour of the Conservative Party. Nor Labour of course!

Any politician who demonstrates any serious intention, mouthing “British values” is fine, to confront the policy of monopoly incarnate in the money creation process and justly release the abundance of creation will very quickly discover they are marginalised and rendered impotent.

The Conservative “election” process is designed to ensure that the candidates the “members” get to vote for are suitable to the power that easily controls politicians with rewards and promised ambitions fulfilled.

What always gives amusement to me is that educated adults play these games believing that the will of the people is being served.

Self interest over a just and moral order is the foundation of Power Politics.

Gary, do you comprehend the credit creation mechanism at the foundation of your nations economy?

Perhaps a preferential voting system would be better, where party members indicate a first, second, third preference etc and the bottom candidate drops out until one candidate obtains more then 50% of the vote. MP’s would exercise their vote as party members.

However, one could say this would risk electing someone MP’s didn’t want. Some weighting meccanism could be built into the system if this was thought a problem.