Comments on: Now it’s warning labels…

by: Gary Monro

Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:44:00 +0100

DE,

That’s funny… Perhaps chav will be so engrossed in trying to solve it he’ll forget hs desire to be a complete prat and save us all a headache?

by: DE

Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:56:37 +0100

Just print a Su Doku puzzle on the back. I hear they are popular.

by: driverchris

Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:22:21 +0100

If Paul’s right we need to put the warning on the inside of the can, at the bottom.

A modern version of the press-gang penny - find an ASBO at the bottom of your bottle of fighting strength cider.

by: Gary Monro

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:02:37 +0100

So we’re agreed then that absolutely everybody will pay absolutely no attention whatsoever to the labels.

Should we tell someone in authority then?

by: Snafu

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:26:53 +0100

Will the comments be as effective as those already displayed on the fronts of cigarette packs?

“Smoking kills” but people smoke regardless.

by: EU Serf

Mon, 29 Aug 2005 13:58:02 +0100

A suggestion warning for the side of Beer made in the USA.

Warning: Drinking this beer will make people think you are a girl.

What will the Warning be on red wine:

GHW: Drinking none of this will result in a higher risk of heart attack.

Where as the most appropriate warning is of course:

Research shows that excessive drinking leads to compromising situations with ugly birds.

by: Paul

Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:18:35 +0100

My thoughts exactly.

People getting drunk aren’t interested in what’s on the side of the can. They are just after what’s inside. I would have thought that much would be obvious. So much isn’t for the Dear Leader and his ~~cretins~~ ministers.