The British police claim he injured himself leaping over a ticket barrier.
Osman says his bomb was harmless but his leg was injured by leaking acid from bomb.

What is going on here?

Is it possible “Osman” could be helping with the “story”, only to be released or disapear from view? We have been told Osman is not his real name. Will we see the evidence presented and tested before a jury?

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=15806382&method=full&siteid=94762&headline=suspect-osman-is-held-as-a–global-terrorist–name_page.html

Forget Robin Cook statement, validated by much other evidence, jump on to grainy video supporting “Muslim conspiracy theory” and run for your life with critical thinking switched to “off”.

Could this be Hollywood Al Qaeda?

So you think the Muslim media and political leadership is any different to the BBC and Blair?

My research indicates they are very sadly similar.

Al jazeera sits on top of one of the wealthiest little oil kingdoms on earth.

It broadcasts lots of provocative but shallow info just like the BBC and CNN.

They are all keeping their respective audiences ignorent and in conflict against each other.
They serve the same idea, monopoly.

This distracts from the political and historical realities of power in action that point towards, establishment of all persuasions conspiring to exploit the masses.

Those who can read should know Hitler`s Germany and Bolshevism were both financed by Wall Street. {Sutton}

The extremist Muslim has been sucked in to obedience to power just like Conservative or Labour supporters.

These control mechanisms exploit the love of prestige, power and peer recognition rewarding capable and clever with wealth and prestige but always in the service of the policy of Monopoly.

While the factional antagonism distracts our constitutional heritage is stolen out from under our nose in broad daylight. Many foolish even cheer and assist completly oblivious to their fate.

Any troublesome turn keys, like Adolph Hitler and Saddam Hussein, get the “devil” treatment.

Unfortunately few people can, or bother to concentrate long enough to see below the headlines.
“Terrorist Suicide Bomber Shot Dead Fleeing Police”

Gary, have you noticed the suspect in Italy is claiming his bomb was mostly flour and completly harmless? What was going on here?
Didn`t Ian Blair tell us this attack was meant to kill. With a spounge cake mix bomb?
Did their ferensic dept examine the solution?
Who do you think is telling the truth?

Notice the “official” version of the bombings is being “unofficially” told by the US media with bomb pictures and now claims that mobile phones were used to set off explosions.

Both of these chapters of the “official” story were introduced by US media as approved by British authorities followed by retractions and appropriate hand slapping.
Could this be in case of the need for plausible denial?

Could the story be in “market test” mode?
Will the public buy it now and forget all those doubts about the suspects character and family history?

Do you think you and others might concentrate on these statements long enough to make any sense of it all. I don`t pretend for a second that this is an easy task but surely justice demands it of us all.